Article: Remedies
for Victims of Sexual Abuse
Article: Connecticut version of Remedies article
Article: Arizona
- "Florez Revisited: Arizona's New Approach to Extending Statutes of
Limitation in Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases"
Legal Resources
for Victims of Sexual Abuse
|
Susan K. Smith
David M. Moore
Attorneys at Law
Mediation, Collaboration
Victims' Remedies
Injury Cases
Smith & Moore, LLC
www.SmithMooreLLC.com
www.smith-lawfirm.com
suesmith@smith-lawfirm.com
24 East Main Street
(Route 44)
Old Avon Village North
Avon, CT 06001
Direct dial:
Atty Smith: (860) 678-1860
Atty. Moore: (860) 674-0122
Fax: (860) 677-5229
Directions & Map
Atty. Smith's Hartford
Conference Space
21 Oak Street
Suite 208
Hartford, CT 06106
Voice: (860) 297-0035
Directions & Map
Martindale-Hubbell
Peer Review Rated
For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability
|

|
The Fine Print: This
web site provides general information only and cannot be relied upon as legal advice. Laws
change and differ from State to State. Applicability of the legal principles
discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. You should consult an
attorney about your particular situation.
COPYRIGHT ©
1998-07 Susan K. Smith All Rights Reserved. Search
Site Map |
|
Statutes of Limitations
for Child Sexual Abuse
Maryland |
| |
Section 5-117 of the Maryland Annotated
Code was signed into law in May of 2003. The statute is effective
October 1, 2003. Civil damage suits for persons who suffered abuse as
minors may be brought within 7 years of the date of reaching their age
of majority. The statute specifically provides, however, that it
shall not be used to revive any cases that were barred prior to the
passage of the new limitation period.
Link to
text of bill (may be temporary).
As of 1997, courts have refused to
recognize a delayed discovery rule. In Doe v. Archdiocese of Washington, 114
Md.App. 169, 689 A.2d 634 (Md.App. 1997) the court held (1) child sexual abuse victim's
cause of action against priests accrued, for statute of limitations purposes, upon date he
attained majority, regardless of when he first appreciated wrongfulness of priests'
alleged actions; (2) plaintiff's alleged failure to appreciate wrongfulness of priests'
alleged misconduct did not rise to level of "mental incompetence," of kind
sufficient to toll statute of limitations); Doe v. Maskell, 342 Md. 684, 679 A.2d
1087 (1996) cert. denied 117 S. Ct. 770 (1997) (refusing to apply insanity
tolling to repressed memory). Resources:
Maryland Coalition Against
Sexual Assault - Includes reports of Legislative Activity
Maryland Statutes |
| Reviewed |
08/25/2007 |
|